be included for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "be included for" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to express that something should be part of a larger group or list, but it lacks clarity and proper context. Example: "All relevant documents should be included for review before the meeting."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Academia

Formal & Business

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Reference

Social Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Furnishings can be included for an additional sum.

The New York Times - Travel

Other parties may be included for an extra premium.

Britannica

Notes mentioning States to be included for proposed marketing expansion.

Cornell University

Foreigners will be included for the first time.

The Economist

Even personal reproductive history will be included, for enforcement of China's controversial "one child" policy.

The New York Times

"I felt that was a strong enough case that they ought to be included for recognition".

The New York Times

Russell is therefore calling for mental health related training to be included for all new teachers.

The Guardian

If Trump voters are less likely to be included, for example, that may bias the analysis.

Harvard Business Review

There was no reference to homosexuals, who had asked to be included for suffering theocratic violence.

The Guardian

Receipts should be included for any expenditures for which repayment is asked.

The New York Times - Travel

An allowance can also be included for "books, supplies, transportation and miscellaneous personal expenses".

Yale University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "be included for" in formal writing. Opt for more grammatically correct alternatives like "be included in" or "be considered for" to ensure clarity and professionalism.

Common error

A common mistake is using "for" when "in" is grammatically correct. Instead of "be included for the analysis", use "be included in the analysis". The preposition "in" correctly indicates containment or membership within a group or process, while "for" implies purpose or direction, which doesn't fit the intended meaning.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "be included for" aims to express the idea of something being part of a group or considered for a specific purpose. However, Ludwig AI identifies this phrase as grammatically incorrect, as it misuses the preposition 'for'.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

35%

News & Media

25%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "be included for" appears frequently across various sources, Ludwig AI flags it as grammatically incorrect. The correct usage typically involves using "be included in" or "be considered for", depending on the intended meaning. Despite its prevalence in contexts such as science, news, and academia, writers should avoid using "be included for" in formal writing to maintain clarity and grammatical accuracy. Remember to use "in" to express containment and "for" to indicate purpose or direction.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

be part of

Directly indicates membership or belonging to a group or set.

be comprised in

Indicates that something is contained within a larger entity.

be considered

Focuses on the act of evaluating or thinking about something, rather than necessarily being part of a group.

be encompassed by

Suggests a broader inclusion within a larger scope or boundary.

be integrated into

Focuses on the process of combining something into a unified whole.

be factored in

Implies incorporating something into a calculation or plan.

be taken into account

Emphasizes that something should be considered when making a decision or assessment.

be featured in

Highlights the presence or showcasing of something within a specific context.

be listed under

Implies placement within a categorized list or directory.

be eligible for

Denotes that something meets the necessary requirements to be considered.

FAQs

What's grammatically wrong with the phrase "be included for"?

The phrase "be included for" is not standard English. The correct phrasing is usually "be included in" or, depending on the context, "be considered for". The preposition "in" indicates containment, while "for" usually indicates purpose.

What can I say instead of "be included for"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "be included in", "be considered for", "be part of", or "be taken into account".

Which is correct, "be included for" or "be included in"?

"Be included in" is the grammatically correct phrase. The preposition "in" indicates that something is part of a larger whole. "Be included for" is generally considered incorrect.

How does the meaning change if I use "be considered for" instead of "be included in"?

"Be included in" implies that something is already a part of something else. "Be considered for" suggests that something is being evaluated for potential inclusion but isn't necessarily part of it yet.