be in of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "be in of" is not correct and not usable in written English.
It appears to be a mix-up of phrases and does not convey a clear meaning. Example: "I want to be in of the project" does not make sense.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

This is not the worst position to be in, of course, but be forewarned.

The New York Times

"I have put myself in a position in which I wanted to be in of course ever since last year's final," he said.

The Guardian - Sport

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

I could be in none of it".

Independent

You be in command of yours".

The New Yorker

She will be in charge of media.

The New Yorker

Everything will be in terms of gigahertz.

Forbes

Who will be in charge of it?

WikiHow

Be in charge of your furniture.

WikiHow

Be in charge of your own life.

WikiHow

Be in control of your life.

WikiHow

Be in charge of your own destiny.

WikiHow

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "be in of" in your writing. It is grammatically incorrect and can confuse your readers. Instead, opt for alternatives like "be part of" or "be involved in".

Common error

A common mistake is to incorrectly combine prepositions. Instead of saying "be in of", ensure you're using the correct preposition that fits the context, such as "be in charge of" or "be part of".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "be in of" is typically intended to function as part of a verb phrase indicating inclusion or involvement. However, it is grammatically incorrect and doesn't fulfill any standard grammatical function. Ludwig indicates that it's an incorrect formulation.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "be in of" is grammatically incorrect and rarely used in written English. As Ludwig AI indicates, it appears to be a mix-up of phrases and does not convey a clear meaning. While it appears in a few contexts, predominantly within News & Media sources, it's crucial to avoid this phrase. Instead, opt for grammatically sound alternatives like "be part of" or "be involved in" to ensure clarity and correctness in your writing. Always prioritize standard English usage to maintain professionalism and avoid confusing your audience.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

be part of

This alternative directly replaces "be in of" to indicate belonging or inclusion within a group or activity.

be involved in

This suggests active participation or engagement, rather than simply being contained within something.

be a member of

This implies formal affiliation or belonging to an organization or group.

consist of

This expresses composition, indicating what elements comprise a whole.

be composed of

Similar to 'consist of', it specifies the components that make up something.

be inside

This indicates a physical location or containment within a space or object.

be within

This implies being located or existing inside the boundaries of something.

be among

This suggests being included or present within a larger group or set.

be among the

Similar to "be among", but emphasizes being part of a distinguished set.

be situated in

This indicates a location or position within a specific area or context.

FAQs

How can I correct the phrase "be in of" in a sentence?

Replace "be in of" with a more appropriate phrase like "be part of" or "be involved in" to ensure grammatical correctness and clarity.

What phrases are similar in meaning to "be in of"?

Consider alternatives such as "be a member of", "consist of", or "be composed of", depending on the intended meaning.

Is "be in of" grammatically correct?

No, "be in of" is not grammatically correct. It's a combination of prepositions that doesn't form a standard English phrase. Use alternatives like "be in charge of" or "be in favor of" where appropriate.

Which is correct, "be in of" or "be part of"?

"Be part of" is the correct and widely accepted phrase. "Be in of" is not grammatically recognized and should be avoided.