Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The paradigm of diagnosis and prediction using pathway-based biomarkers as features can be an important part of the process of biomarker-based cancer analysis, and the resulting canonical (clinically reproducible) biomarkers can be important in standardizing genomic data.
Similar(56)
To discuss the experiences of using microbes to treat human diseases from ancient China to current era should be important in moving standardized FMT forward and achieving a better future.
More detailed studies comparing disaggregated standardized information will be important in evaluating the impact and effect of national differences in screening.
It appears to be important to standardize the preanalytical procedures in order to study biological fluids, as centrifugation procedures or the choice of a specific anticoagulant may affect the reproducibility of MV analyses.
Moreover, the optimal concentration was never investigated before and such studies will be important to standardize a reproducible controlled guideline, to be used in clinical translational approaches.
Therefore, it's important to standardize your weigh-in procedures in order to get a more accurate indication of your progress.
It was important to standardize seed weight in this way because significant differences in seed weight among domestication levels were primarily because of the large glumes in wild barley.
However, it is important to standardize the procedure in liquid media inoculated with clinical specimens to reduce the time to diagnosis.
In an era where information exchange is important, standardizing conventions is a necessity.
There are different methods for identifying biomarkers in blood (Table 1); hence, it is important to standardize the methods of generation of proteomic data and the entire workflow.
In view of the above considerations, it is important to standardize techniques and protocols used, to be able to compare the results of different research groups.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com