Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
be illustrated on
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "be illustrated on" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; the correct preposition should be "in" or "by" instead of "on." Example: "The main concepts will be illustrated in the following sections."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
Academia
News & Media
Alternative expressions(6)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
19 human-written examples
These algorithms will be illustrated on real-world examples such as those mentioned.
Academia
The proposed methodology will be illustrated on a reactor network exhibiting complex behaviour.
The proposed methodologies will be illustrated on a full body-in-white structure for a car.
Science
These ideas will be illustrated on the problem of field reconstruction for unstable tubular reactors.
These aspects will be illustrated on some recent examples of non-silicon systems.
The different aspects of the proposed methodology will be illustrated on a non-isothermal chemical reaction network.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
41 human-written examples
An illustration of this family of models are illustrated on Figure 10. Figure 10 Dirichlet family.
The approach is illustrated on simulation examples.
Science
The approach is illustrated on application examples.
The methods are illustrated on simple examples.
Science
The proposed approach is illustrated on a highway bridge network.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Prefer using prepositions like "in" or "by" instead of "on" when describing how something is illustrated. For instance, "The concept will be illustrated in the following examples" is grammatically sounder than using "on."
Common error
Avoid using the preposition "on" with "illustrated" as it is often grammatically incorrect. Using "in" or "by" creates clearer and more standard English. Always review your preposition choice to ensure accuracy.
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "be illustrated on" is a passive construction where the action of illustrating is applied to a subject. However, as Ludwig AI indicates, the preposition "on" is typically incorrect in this context, making the phrase grammatically questionable. Most often appears in academic and scientific contexts.
Frequent in
Science
68%
Academia
20%
News & Media
12%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "be illustrated on" is a passive construction used to indicate that something will be clarified through examples. However, Ludwig AI highlights that it's often grammatically incorrect; prepositions like "in" or "by" are generally more appropriate. While common in academic and scientific contexts, particularly in sources like ScienceDirect and BMC Genomics, its correctness is questionable. Therefore, writers should prefer alternatives such as "be illustrated in" or "be exemplified by" to ensure clarity and grammatical accuracy. Careful attention to preposition choice can significantly enhance the precision and credibility of your writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
be exemplified by
This alternative replaces "illustrated on" with a more formal and grammatically accepted phrasing.
be shown in
This phrase focuses on visual representation but uses a grammatically correct preposition.
be demonstrated through
This emphasizes the method of demonstration, offering a clearer and more precise alternative.
be depicted in
This option highlights visual portrayal, providing a direct substitute for "illustrated".
be represented by
This focuses on the representation aspect, using a more standard grammatical structure.
be highlighted in
This shifts the focus to emphasizing specific points within the illustration or example.
be explained with
This relates to providing understanding using particular examples
be clarified by
This suggests that something is made easier to understand by means of an example.
be supported by
This emphasizes the evidence provided by the illustration, moving beyond mere visual representation.
be embodied in
This suggests that the illustration serves as a perfect representation or example of the concept.
FAQs
What's a more grammatically correct way to say "be illustrated on"?
Instead of "be illustrated on", consider using phrases like "be illustrated "be illustrated by"", "be illustrated "be illustrated in"", or "be "be exemplified by"" for improved clarity and correctness.
How can I use "be illustrated by" in a sentence?
You can use "be illustrated by" to show how a concept is made clearer through examples. For example, "The theory will "be illustrated by" several case studies."
Is "be illustrated on" ever correct, or should it always be avoided?
While rare, "be illustrated on" might appear in specific technical contexts, but it's generally safer to replace it with ""be illustrated by"" or ""be illustrated in"" to ensure grammatical correctness.
What are some alternatives to "be illustrated on" that still convey the same meaning?
Other phrases you can use include "be demonstrated through", "be depicted in", or "be represented by", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested