The broad relationship between gene expression in the different samples was illustrated by plotting the log ratios of differential expression between LPS-stimulated and unstimulated samples for the individual for whom there were repeat PBMC samples.
Model fits were illustrated by plotting simulated and measured values of SaO2 and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio versus FiO2.
This was illustrated by plotting the log2-transformed FCs of all exons in each gene, as shown in Additional file 3B.
When the chirality of the SWs was reversed from clockwise to anticlockwise, the behaviour of SWs starting at the same location was changed; see Figures 3 and 4. In Figure 4, the drift is illustrated by plotting the x, y, and z coordinates of the tip with respect to time.
For the comparison of the genetic position of genes within LGs, the data are illustrated by plotting the normalized position of the common genes on our map (X) relative to the normalized position on the Eckert map (Y) (for instance, LG 2 and LG 4 in Figure 2).
When both the covariates and treatment are significant, and both of the treatment-by-covariate interactions are significant, but there is no covariate-by-covariate interaction, the effect can be illustrated by the plot shown in Fig. 8.
The principle of this and other insights can be illustrated by comparing plots generated with equations 1 and 2, the most notable being the striking symmetry between amplicon DNA accumulation and reduction in cycle efficiency.
This association can be illustrated by the regression line on a funnel plot (figure 1).
This was illustrated by our plot of the short-term rates of genetic gain against the short-term rates of inbreeding realised by each restriction.
