Sentence examples for be hard for scientists from inspiring English sources

The mindset that "it doesn't have to be invented here" can be hard for scientists to accept, he said, but ignoring that mindset can restrict innovation.

"It's going to be hard for scientists to convince themselves just because of our only partial understanding of the complexity of the processes that are taking place," he says.

It's difficult to produce large groups of genetically identical worms and flies, so it can be hard for scientists to tell whether a genetically modified strain acts differently than control worms or flies because of its altered DNA or because the two sets of animals have other genetic variations.

Moreover, Ohlemacher says, it can be hard for scientists in these countries to communicate the benefits of Earth observations to more traditional populations, who might not understand how information derived from space could be useful or even desirable.

Bostock herself came from a background in philosophy and psychiatry, but she thinks that although it "may be harder for scientists to come to ethics than for ethicists to understand the scientific issues, it has been done, and the Wellcome Trust are really encouraging it".

It is hard for scientists to offer predictions about the present spill, for two reasons.

It has been hard for scientists to measure the medical threat that rats pose.

Denisovans appeared later, and from the fossils alone it was hard for scientists to know if Denisovans and Neanderthals had ever come into contact.

It is hard for scientists to enjoy watching a movie that ignores, as though it is irrelevant, the hard-won but ultimately glorious knowledge of how to decide when perceived risks are real and when they are not.

"It's hard for scientists to say we don't know," said Dr. Mark G. Knize, a member of the Biology and Biotechnology Research Program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Livermore, Calif., who is conducting some of the research on the effects of marinades.

Although epidemiological studies were critical in proving the dangers of cigarettes, the magnitude of the reported meat risk is much smaller, and it is hard for scientists to rule out statistical confounding as the cause of the apparent danger.