Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

be good with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"be good with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe someone or something that is adept or proficient at a certain skill or activity. For example, "My friend Mary is really good with numbers; she's great at crunching data."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He'll be good with the crowds".

"That'd be good with eggs," she said.

News & Media

The New York Times

Given the family fortune, Phil must be good with numbers.

News & Media

Independent

I knew the field goal would be good with Jeff.

In both, it helps to be good with words.

But surely a minister must be good with numbers.

They have to be good with other cats, they have to be good with people and they have to be cats that don't attack people.

The performance of the system is found to be good with respect to large practical problems.

All the other — unaffiliated — Red Hen restaurants would be good with that, too.

Smoked tofu is used here, but it would be good with smoky bacon or pancetta, too.

In 2001, we guessed he'd be good with a chance to be great.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "be good with" to describe someone's abilities or compatibility in specific situations, ensuring clarity and relevance. For example, "She's good with kids" or "He's good with computers".

Common error

Avoid replacing "with" with other prepositions like "at" or "in" when describing someone's skill or ability. Saying "He's good at kids" or "She's good in computers" is grammatically incorrect and changes the meaning.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "be good with" functions as an adjective phrase, describing someone's ability or proficiency in dealing with a specific subject, object, or person. As Ludwig AI confirms, it indicates skill and positive interaction. Examples include "be good with numbers" or "be good with kids".

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Wiki

33%

Science

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "be good with" is a common and versatile expression used to describe someone's proficiency, skill, or compatibility in various contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct and widely used. It is prevalent in news articles and online content, indicating its general acceptance. While it can be used in various situations, it’s crucial to use the preposition "with" correctly and avoid substituting it with other prepositions. The phrase is considered grammatically sound, making it a reliable choice for expressing someone's aptitude or ability. The most frequent contexts where you can find "be good with" are News & Media, Wiki and Science.

FAQs

How can I use "be good with" in a sentence?

Use "be good with" to describe someone's proficiency or skill in handling a specific task, subject, or even people. For instance, "He's good with numbers", or "She's good with animals".

What does it mean to "be good with" something or someone?

To "be good with" something means you possess a natural aptitude or developed skill in handling or dealing with it effectively. It can also imply patience and understanding, like being good with children or animals.

What are some alternatives to saying "be good with"?

You can use alternatives like "have a knack for", "be skilled at", or "be proficient in" to express a similar meaning depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "be good at" instead of "be good with"?

While "be good at" is also correct, it has a slightly different nuance. "Be good at" typically refers to a skill or activity, whereas "be good with" often implies a natural ability to handle or interact with something or someone. For example, "He's good at math" versus "He's good with people".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: