Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(2)
That might be good for the reader, and thereby for Facebook long term, but it's dangerous for the publishers.
Whereas this review is of considerable interest, the authors might consider the following points for making their MS even more informative: 1) It would be good for the reader to see diagrams of the sequence architecture of representatives of the several Notch ligand classes as a figure.
Similar(55)
It's good for the reader, but the creator of the content loses the traffic to its own website and control of how it's presented.
This wisdom may be good for the business side, but the reader does not like to think of the content as mere worms for an advertiser's hook.
What is bad for the Republicans should be good for the Democrats but, as the New York Times reminds readers, they are still experiencing problems unifying around a clear message.
It may be good for the writers' brands, but it's not good for readers.
For reader NB the intra-reader agreement was good for the Wolfe classification (Kappa = 0.61; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.89) and very good for the Tabár classification (Kappa = 0.89; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.00).
I think it would be good for young readers, because they would either know it already or find it out whilst reading a book, which they would hopefully enjoy.
Regardless, I only recommend products or services I use personally and believe will be good for my readers.
That doesn't mean it will be good for readers who value more interesting English.
"They have also abundantly demonstrated that literature can be taken in new and exciting directions and that has to be good for readers everywhere".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com