Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
be further splitted into
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "be further splitted into" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct form should be "be further split into," as "split" is the appropriate past participle of the verb. Example: "The data can be further split into several categories for analysis."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
Alternative expressions(13)
be further divided into
be further subdivided into
be further split into
be further separated into
be further categorized into
be further classified into
be further processed into
be further converted into
be further transformed into
be further dissected into
be further developed into
be further clustered into
be further decomposed into
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
Each cell slot can be further splitted into smaller mini-slots.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
58 human-written examples
Due to the J-T effect, the ground state 2Eg is further splitted into 2B1g ground and 2Ag excited states, and the 2T2g is separated into 2B2g ground and 2Eg excited states [35, 36].
Science
(a) The optical flow vectors, (b) the blurred optic flow in the x and y direction is further split into the four Gaussian blurred nonnegative channels.
For all DNN training, the data sets were further split into training and development sets making up 90 and 10%%, respectively, with the development set used for hyperparameter search and early stopping.
With the given outgroup, all the local phylogenetic trees were further split into primary rooted triplets.
Science
For some, fatigue was still a problem and therefore interviews were further split into several shorter interviews.
Science
Model 3 used 6 outputs where inpatient discharges and day care were further split into subgroups: medical, surgical and other cases in the inpatient care and medical and surgical for day care.
It can be further split into three subfamilies: Indo-Aryan, Dardic, and Iranian.
Encyclopedias
This R-type could be further split into sub-types R1 (12 plots) and R2 (8 plots).
Science
These two broad categories of landmarking methods can each be further split into two sub-categories.
The step of cloud authenticating mobile devices can be further split into two sub-steps.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Always use "split" as the past participle of the verb 'split'. Avoid using the non-standard form 'splitted'.
Common error
Do not use "splitted" as the past participle of 'split.' The correct form is "split."
Source & Trust
74%
Authority and reliability
2.2/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "be further splitted into" functions as a passive construction, attempting to describe how something is divided into smaller or more specific parts. However, as Ludwig AI indicates, the term 'splitted' is grammatically incorrect; the correct form is 'split'.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "be further splitted into" is grammatically incorrect. The correct past participle of 'split' is 'split'. Although the phrase appears primarily in scientific contexts, its incorrect grammar lowers its overall quality and acceptability. Ludwig AI highlights that the correct phrase is "be further split into". When writing, always use the correct past participle to maintain grammatical accuracy and clarity. Several alternatives exist, such as "be further divided into" or "be further broken down into", which can be used depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
be further divided into
Replaces "splitted" with the correct past participle "divided".
be further broken down into
Uses "broken down" instead of "split", implying a more detailed or granular division.
be further subdivided into
Uses "subdivided" to emphasize a hierarchical division.
be further separated into
Uses "separated" to focus on the distinctness of the resulting parts.
be further categorized into
Uses "categorized" to highlight a division based on classification.
be further classified into
Similar to "categorized", but emphasizes a more formal or systematic division.
be further partitioned into
Suggests a formal or structured division, often used in technical contexts.
be further delineated into
Emphasizes a clear and precise division with defined boundaries.
be further fragmented into
Implies a division resulting in smaller, possibly disconnected, pieces.
be further resolved into
Suggests a division that clarifies or simplifies a complex whole.
FAQs
What is the correct past participle of "split"?
The correct past participle of "split" is "split", not "splitted". Therefore, you should use "be further split into".
What can I say instead of "be further splitted into"?
You can use alternatives like "be further divided into", "be further broken down into", or "be further subdivided into".
Is "be further splitted into" grammatically correct?
No, "be further splitted into" is not grammatically correct. The correct phrasing is "be further split into".
How do I use "be further split into" in a sentence?
Here's an example: "The data can "be further split into" categories for analysis."
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
74%
Authority and reliability
2.2/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested