be false positive in

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "be false positive in" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to describe a situation where something is incorrectly identified as positive, but the phrasing is awkward and unclear. Example: "The test results may be false positive in certain cases, leading to unnecessary anxiety."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

Several autoantibodies like RF and ANA which are commonly tested in rheumatological disorders may be false positive in leprosy [ 22].

Clinical Rheumatology

HE4 complements CA125 especially in younger women, were CA125 can be false positive in a variety of physiological conditions and benign diseases, including endometriosis [ 6].

Clinical Proteomics

In our setting, in patients with both CeD and IBD, initial CeD serological testing were performed in most of the cases with EMA, which are highly specific for CeD and are not found in IBD [ 22]. tTG can be false positive in some chronic disorders such as type 1 diabetes mellitus and chronic liver diseases.

BMC Gastroenterology

Some of the triggers such as Transfusion, Abrupt drop in hemoglobin, Pain, Glucose <3 mmol/l or administration of 300 mg/ml or 500 mg/ml glucose and Failures in cardiovascular, respiratory, and neurological function, for example, were common in Review Stage 1, but were often judged to be false positive in the RN and physician reviews.

BMC Health Services Research

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

Four cases in the non-MG group showed a discordant κ/ λ ratio and were shown to be false positives in the Freelite assay.

BioMed Research International

However, this was also found to be part of a tRNA transcript, which demonstrates that ncRNAs such as tRNAs can be false positives in computational miRNA predictions.

BMC Genomics

There may be false positives in Λ i _ closest, as computation of local reference frames are noisy and Λ is a dimensionally reduced description (resulting in loss of information) of a local 3D region.

Bioinformatics

The genes CG14687 and B52 appeared to be false positives in our microarray analysis as either no, or only a very small, change in expression levels was detected by qRT-PCR (Fig. 4H,I).

Biology Open

McCutcheon and Eddy verified the transcription of eight candidate ncRNAs (RUF1-8) usiNorthernern blots; three of these (RUF4, RUF6, RUF7), however, turned out to be false positives in later experiments; RUF8 was identified as a misclassified ORF.

BMC Biology

LUS was false positive in eight cases (6.2%) and false negative in nine patients (7%).

Critical Ultrasound Journal

Since we couldn't find SFPs with higher d-stat value being false positive in both the datasets and all the false positives in CP&RT dataset had d-stat values close to permuted cut-off value (data not shown) suggesting that most false positives, if not all, would be among the SFPs that has d-stat value close to permuted cut-off level.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing test results or diagnostic outcomes, use clearer and more grammatically sound phrases such as "result in a false positive" or "produce a false positive".

Common error

Avoid using the construction "be false positive in". It's often better to rephrase to clearly indicate what is producing or resulting in the false positive. For instance, instead of "the test may be false positive in some cases", try "the test may result in a false positive in some cases".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "be false positive in" functions as a descriptive phrase attempting to specify a condition where something incorrectly tests or appears as positive. However, it's not grammatically sound and requires rephrasing for clarity. Ludwig AI highlights its incorrectness.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "be false positive in" attempts to describe situations where something incorrectly indicates a positive result. However, as Ludwig AI points out, this phrasing is grammatically incorrect and awkward. The analysis of example sentences shows that this phrase appears primarily in scientific contexts, but its grammatical issues impact its overall suitability for formal writing. For improved clarity and correctness, it is advisable to use alternatives such as "result in a false positive" or "produce a false positive". These alternatives provide a more precise and grammatically sound way to express the intended meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

result in a false positive

This alternative focuses on the outcome of a process, where a false positive result is generated.

produce a false positive

This alternative emphasizes the action of producing an incorrect positive result.

show a false positive

This option is used when indicating that a test or analysis displays an incorrect positive outcome.

yield a false positive

This alternative is similar to "produce a false positive" but implies a more formal or scientific context.

give a false positive reading

This phrase specifies that the false positive occurs on a reading or measurement.

generate a false positive result

This emphasizes the creation of a false positive outcome, often in experimental settings.

be incorrectly identified as positive

This version highlights the act of incorrect identification rather than the result itself.

register as a false positive

This is used when something is recorded or shows up as a false positive.

return a false positive

This alternative is often used in the context of tests or analyses providing a false positive result.

indicate a false positive

This phrase denotes that something suggests a false positive, rather than directly being one.

FAQs

How can I correctly use the term "false positive" in a sentence?

Instead of saying something might "be false positive in" a situation, phrase it as "result in a "false positive"" or "produce a "false positive"" to ensure grammatical correctness and clarity.

What's a more precise way to say something "is false positive in" a specific context?

Consider using alternatives such as "yields a "false positive"" or "shows a "false positive"" to provide a clearer and more accurate description of the situation.

When is it appropriate to use the term "false positive" in scientific writing?

In scientific writing, always aim for clarity. Instead of "be false positive in", opt for "generate a "false positive result"" or "indicate a "false positive"" to maintain precision and grammatical correctness.

Are there situations where "be false positive in" is acceptable, or should it always be rephrased?

While the phrase might be understood in informal contexts, it's generally advisable to rephrase it for clarity and grammatical accuracy, especially in formal or scientific writing. Use alternatives like "register as a "false positive"" or "return a "false positive"" for better communication.