This can be explained by the different vacuum conditions of the two microscopes: in worse vacuum, there are more hydrocarbons available, resulting in higher beam-induced carbon deposition rates.
This might be explained by a better compromise between vacuum cup traction and perineal resistance owing to the 'mixed' properties of the new disposable ventouse, in particular its 'non-lateralised' aspiration tube.
The higher THI and TOI after vacuum extraction in our study can be explained by several factors.
This can be explained by different scenarios.
This could be explained by human selection.
This can be explained by multiple possibilities.
The extra photoconductivity in vacuum is explained by desorption of adsorbed surface oxygen which is readily pumped out, followed by a further slower desorption of lattice oxygen, resulting in a Zn-rich surface of increased conductivity.
The results reported so far can be explained consistently by assuming that during vacuum annealing hydrogen-induced, compensating shallow donor or passivating defects are eliminated from the film.
This is partly explained by better testing.
This difference was not explained by diet.
