be explained by two folds

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "be explained by two folds" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be an attempt to convey that something can be understood through two different aspects or reasons, but the expression is awkward and unclear. Example: "The phenomenon can be explained by two folds: the environmental factors and the social influences."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

This finding is interesting since it means that these 45 molecules were recognized as both agonists and antagonists of AR simultaneously, which may be explained by two folds: (1) they indeed possess both MOA detected by different screens; (2) this observation may reflect underlying experimental errors.

Journal of Cheminformatics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

This can be explained by two reasons.

Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation

It can be explained by two factors.

BBC

It can be explained by two reasons.

Nanoscale Research Letters

This may be explained by two reasons.

Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source

This can be explained by two factors.

BMC Family Practice

This may be explained by two factors.

BMC Family Practice

This can be explained by two effects.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

This might be explained by two differences.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

This can be explained by three factors.

Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training

No or low activity of other proteases may be explained by incorrect folding or processing.

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "be explained by two folds" in formal writing. Instead, opt for more common and grammatically sound alternatives like "be explained by two reasons" or "be explained by two factors" for clarity.

Common error

A frequent mistake is using "folds" when "factors", "reasons", or "aspects" are more appropriate. Ensure you're using the correct noun to describe the explanatory elements. For example, avoid "the problem is two folds" and use "the problem has two aspects" instead.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "be explained by two folds" attempts to express a cause-and-effect relationship, identifying two underlying reasons or aspects. However, it's grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI indicates that this phrasing is not standard English and suggests alternatives.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "be explained by two folds" is grammatically incorrect and rarely used in standard English. As Ludwig AI explains, this phrasing is non-idiomatic, and it's better to use alternatives like "be explained by two reasons" or "be explained by two factors". These alternatives provide clarity and are more widely accepted across various contexts, including scientific and news-related content. Therefore, it's advisable to avoid the original phrasing in favor of these more appropriate options.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

be explained by two reasons

Replaces "folds" with the more common "reasons", improving clarity and naturalness.

be explained by two factors

Substitutes "folds" with "factors", offering a clearer and more widely accepted way to express the idea.

be attributed to two causes

Uses "attributed to" to emphasize causality and replaces "folds" with "causes" for better readability.

be due to two distinct elements

Emphasizes the separate nature of the explanatory elements with "distinct elements".

have two explanations

Simplifies the structure to a more direct statement about the number of explanations.

stem from two main sources

Indicates that the phenomenon originates from two primary sources.

be a result of two components

Focuses on the components that contribute to the outcome.

rest on two key principles

Implies that the explanation is founded on two fundamental principles.

be understood through two lenses

Introduces a metaphorical perspective, suggesting different ways of interpreting the phenomenon.

be clarified by two aspects

Highlights that the concept can be made clearer by considering two different aspects.

FAQs

What is a more appropriate way to say "be explained by two folds"?

Better alternatives include "be explained by two reasons", "be explained by two factors", or "be attributed to two causes", which are clearer and grammatically correct.

Is the phrase "be explained by two folds" grammatically correct?

No, the phrase "be explained by two folds" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. It's better to use alternatives like "be explained by two reasons".

When is it appropriate to use "be explained by two folds"?

It is generally not appropriate to use "be explained by two folds" in formal or academic writing. Opt for clearer and more accepted alternatives in all contexts.

What's the difference between "be explained by two folds" and "be explained by two factors"?

"Be explained by two folds" is grammatically awkward and less common. "Be explained by two factors" is a standard and clear way to express that something can be understood through two distinct elements.