Results indicated that 65.7 ± 0.3% of the variance of SOC in the study area was explained by texture classes.
We speculate that this pattern may be explained by the relationship between texture and soil moisture availability.
The differences in θ cannot be explained by differences in soil texture with the burned end with sand soil and the unburned end with less permeable loamy sand.
This can be explained by the facial point features and texture around them which, for some of them, are more robust and discriminant.
Then, the formation of (111) and (110) textures and the change in the texture from (111) to (110) can be explained by the kinetic theory of 2D and 3D nucleation.
Almost all fur growth type and texture phenotypes have also been shown to be explained by only three genes (FGF5, KRT71, and RSPO2).
The deviations that appear for the textures obtained at high temperature can be explained by the occurrence of dynamic recrystallization.
Now a team says the cold spot is too large to be explained by standard models and is evidence that, like a giant patchwork quilt, the universe might have something like texture.
This can be explained by different scenarios.
This could be explained by human selection.
