Given the multiple issues identified regarding tests of statistical significance in this context, we recommend that caution should be exercised when interpreting any measures of a psychometric property which rely on tests of statistical significance.
Although caution must be exercised when comparing absolute values of measured surface potentials, our experiments were performed under identical conditions with the same Pt tip to enable some comparison.
Finally, caution should be exercised when interpreting these results as we measured the perceived management competencies of the residents in our survey, and it is possible that the scores could have been different if objective assessment methods had been used.
Nevertheless, caution should be exercised when using the non-injured leg as a reference measure.
Caution must be exercised when considering the results of studies where valid and reliable outcome measures have not been used.
This may have introduced bias in subjective measures such as the ASEX, and caution should thus be exercised when interpreting these results.
Caution should perhaps be exercised when identifying misfitting items.
In real options, an option is exercised when its exercise value is greater than continuation value.
Of course, caution should be exercised also when applying d N/d S as a measure of selection to closely related species, as shared and lineage-specific polymorphisms may bias the estimate [ 44].
When the distorted image is measured, caution should be exercised, as the measurement may be affected.
