Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

be excluded to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The part of a sentence 'be excluded to' is not correct in written English.
You cannot use it in any context. Correct example: He was excluded from the group.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

54 human-written examples

Once the anomaly is detected, the sub-filter contaminated by the anomaly measurements will be excluded to ensure the reliability of the estimates.

The complexes were only marginally active at the DNA, ER and the COX enzymes, so these targets can be excluded to be involved in the mode of action.

And in a later conversation, Mr. Shultz, according to a federal official, said that "in our talks with Eliot, they became talks out in the press," implying that Mr. Spitzer should be excluded to avoid leaks to the news media.

News & Media

The New York Times

His testimony must be excluded to comply with Miranda's mandate that 'no evidence obtained as a result of interrogation (not preceded by adequate warnings) can be used against' an accused.

Ideally, all the natural enemies should be excluded, to make sure that the differences are not due to different response of plants from the two ranges to the natural enemies.

The Cosby case is, in the end, an emblem of #MeToo, not just because it ended in a guilty verdict but because of the exceptional if controversial evidentiary procedure that enabled a chorus of witnesses — witnesses who would generally be excluded — to back up the main complaining witness, which could well have made the difference between a juror having a reasonable doubt and not having it.

News & Media

The New Yorker
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

6 human-written examples

Names were excluded to maintain anonymity.

And how did the reporters feel whose other articles were excluded to make space?

News & Media

The New York Times

Drugs with <10 resistant samples were excluded to avoid overly large confidence intervals.

Science & Research

Nature

Gifts or bequests were excluded, to minimize the potential of lawsuits from donors or their heirs.

Other invertebrate species were excluded to reduce data variance.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing exclusions, clearly state the reason for the exclusion to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

A common mistake is using "be excluded to" to express purpose, which is grammatically incorrect. Instead, use "in order to exclude" or "to avoid" followed by the undesired outcome. For example, instead of "Data was excluded to avoid bias", write "Data was excluded in order to avoid bias."

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

1.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "be excluded to" is typically used in an attempt to express purpose, indicating why something is being left out or prevented. However, it's grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI identifies that the construction attempts to form a purpose clause but fails to adhere to standard English grammar rules.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

62%

News & Media

20%

Academia

9%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "be excluded to" appears frequently, as shown by Ludwig's examples, it is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI highlights that its attempted use as a purpose clause fails to meet standard English grammar rules. Instead, accurate alternatives like "be excluded from", "in order to exclude", or rephrasing the sentence are recommended. Its presence across various source types doesn't validate its usage; rather, it underscores the importance of grammatical accuracy, especially in formal and scientific writing. Therefore, writers should avoid this construction to maintain clarity and credibility.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "exclude" in a sentence?

The verb "exclude" generally requires a preposition like "from". For example, "The data was excluded from the study" is correct. Avoid using the construction "be excluded to".

What can I say instead of "be excluded to"?

You can use phrases like "be excluded from", "be omitted from", or rephrase the sentence to use "in order to exclude" or "to avoid".

Why is "be excluded to" considered grammatically incorrect?

The phrase "be excluded to" incorrectly attempts to form a purpose clause. The correct way to express purpose is with "in order to" or "to" followed by a verb. "Be excluded from" is the correct phrasing when indicating something is not included.

Is there a difference between "be excluded from" and "be omitted from"?

While both phrases indicate something is not included, "be omitted from" often implies a more deliberate act of leaving something out, whereas "be excluded from" simply means it's not part of something.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

1.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: