Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
be excluded to
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The part of a sentence 'be excluded to' is not correct in written English.
You cannot use it in any context. Correct example: He was excluded from the group.
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Academia
Alternative expressions(20)
be excluded from
be omitted from
to be omitted from
to be left out of
to be removed from
to be prevented from
to be precluded from
to be barred from
be denied to
be canceled to
be restricted to
be excused to
be included to
be discontinued to
be invalidated to
be deducted to
be expelled to
be deduced to
be excepted to
be obliged to
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
54 human-written examples
Once the anomaly is detected, the sub-filter contaminated by the anomaly measurements will be excluded to ensure the reliability of the estimates.
The complexes were only marginally active at the DNA, ER and the COX enzymes, so these targets can be excluded to be involved in the mode of action.
And in a later conversation, Mr. Shultz, according to a federal official, said that "in our talks with Eliot, they became talks out in the press," implying that Mr. Spitzer should be excluded to avoid leaks to the news media.
News & Media
His testimony must be excluded to comply with Miranda's mandate that 'no evidence obtained as a result of interrogation (not preceded by adequate warnings) can be used against' an accused.
Academia
Ideally, all the natural enemies should be excluded, to make sure that the differences are not due to different response of plants from the two ranges to the natural enemies.
The Cosby case is, in the end, an emblem of #MeToo, not just because it ended in a guilty verdict but because of the exceptional if controversial evidentiary procedure that enabled a chorus of witnesses — witnesses who would generally be excluded — to back up the main complaining witness, which could well have made the difference between a juror having a reasonable doubt and not having it.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
6 human-written examples
Names were excluded to maintain anonymity.
And how did the reporters feel whose other articles were excluded to make space?
News & Media
Drugs with <10 resistant samples were excluded to avoid overly large confidence intervals.
Science & Research
Gifts or bequests were excluded, to minimize the potential of lawsuits from donors or their heirs.
News & Media
Other invertebrate species were excluded to reduce data variance.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When describing exclusions, clearly state the reason for the exclusion to avoid ambiguity.
Common error
A common mistake is using "be excluded to" to express purpose, which is grammatically incorrect. Instead, use "in order to exclude" or "to avoid" followed by the undesired outcome. For example, instead of "Data was excluded to avoid bias", write "Data was excluded in order to avoid bias."
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "be excluded to" is typically used in an attempt to express purpose, indicating why something is being left out or prevented. However, it's grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI identifies that the construction attempts to form a purpose clause but fails to adhere to standard English grammar rules.
Frequent in
Science
62%
News & Media
20%
Academia
9%
Less common in
Formal & Business
4%
Wiki
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, while the phrase "be excluded to" appears frequently, as shown by Ludwig's examples, it is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI highlights that its attempted use as a purpose clause fails to meet standard English grammar rules. Instead, accurate alternatives like "be excluded from", "in order to exclude", or rephrasing the sentence are recommended. Its presence across various source types doesn't validate its usage; rather, it underscores the importance of grammatical accuracy, especially in formal and scientific writing. Therefore, writers should avoid this construction to maintain clarity and credibility.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
to be omitted from
Replaces "excluded" with "omitted", emphasizing the act of leaving something out from a list or consideration.
to be left out of
Uses a more informal phrasing to indicate that something is not included.
to be removed from
Highlights the act of taking something away or excluding it.
to be prevented from
Focuses on the action of stopping something from happening or being included.
to be precluded from
Offers a more formal synonym for prevented, emphasizing impossibility.
to be barred from
Suggests a more formal or legal exclusion, emphasizing a prohibition.
to be kept out of
Implies an active effort to ensure something remains separate or not involved.
to be prohibited from
Indicates a formal ban or restriction, often with legal or official implications.
to be exempted from
Focuses on being free from an obligation or requirement that others must follow.
to be disqualified from
Highlights being ineligible or unfit for a specific role or participation.
FAQs
What is the correct way to use "exclude" in a sentence?
The verb "exclude" generally requires a preposition like "from". For example, "The data was excluded from the study" is correct. Avoid using the construction "be excluded to".
What can I say instead of "be excluded to"?
You can use phrases like "be excluded from", "be omitted from", or rephrase the sentence to use "in order to exclude" or "to avoid".
Why is "be excluded to" considered grammatically incorrect?
The phrase "be excluded to" incorrectly attempts to form a purpose clause. The correct way to express purpose is with "in order to" or "to" followed by a verb. "Be excluded from" is the correct phrasing when indicating something is not included.
Is there a difference between "be excluded from" and "be omitted from"?
While both phrases indicate something is not included, "be omitted from" often implies a more deliberate act of leaving something out, whereas "be excluded from" simply means it's not part of something.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested