Suggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Statistical significance will be evaluated using Chi square analysis.
Similar(59)
Students case preferences for learning and realism, and EViP will be evaluated using chi-squared tests for grouping factors case design and number.
Results were evaluated using Chi Square (χ2) Correlation Test.
Heterogeneity within study results was evaluated using Chi squared test and I 2 statistic.
Categorical data were evaluated using chi square test.
The effect of age (group 1; <48 months, group 2; ≥48 months) to mf prevalence was evaluated using chi square tests.
The distribution of clinico-pathological characteristics by the CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*17 variants was evaluated using Chi square tests.
The correlation between STAT1 and other clinical parameters was evaluated using Chi square or Student's t test.
Comparisons of the relative accuracy of anatomical knowledge between the present and earlier results, and across the clinical and general public groups were evaluated using Chi square tests.
Comparisons of relative accuracy of anatomical knowledge between the present and earlier results, and across the clinical and general public groups were evaluated using Chi square tests.
Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS for Windows, version 17. Statistical differences between the study and control groups were evaluated using chi square-tests for dichotomous variables; continuous variables were analyzed using independent sample t-tests.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com