Still, any parallels must be drawn with caution.
However, because of the unsatisfactory power of the study, conclusions are to be drawn with caution.
However, conclusions from this study should be drawn with caution because of its methodological limitations (cross-sectional design, heterogeneity of study population, and small number of patients).
Together with non-specific effects of AOs and the difficulties of assessing target specificity, this makes the use of AOs a complex approach from which conclusions must be drawn with caution.
All these variations have modest appeal in terms of face validity, but any inferences need to be drawn with caution, since the three clustering solutions are for different datasets (albeit from same responders), and so are not directly comparable.
Nevertheless, taking into account the complexity and the several molecular interactions that constitute the cascade of events associated with resistance and endurance exercise, conclusions should be drawn with caution.
Given the scarcity of literature assessing the effect of COD training modes and the reported small to moderate associations between strength and power variables with COD performance and different characteristics (e.g., test duration, COD number, and primary application of force throughout the test) of the agility tests commonly used to evaluate COD [52], conclusions should be drawn with caution.
Any conclusion based on RRT should therefore be drawn with great caution.
Our data are obtained from a single patient and her parents; thus, any conclusion needs to be drawn with reasonable caution.
Most importantly, inferences regarding causality must be drawn with great caution from observational studies.
Our study also had other limitations, and conclusions should therefore be drawn with some caution.
