Suggestions(2)
Exact(1)
The goal of the replicate runs was to perform a DIGE-like experiment with three replicate samples, because this is a) the minimum of experiments which should be done for statistical validity and b) the number of experiments often desired by researchers in practice.
Similar(59)
Ordinal variables present in the dataset were treated as categorical variables; this was done for statistical simplicity, but it gives a conservative estimate of relative importance (Agresti 2010).
Fisher exact test was done for statistical evaluation of difference in genetic make-up between P. lilacinum and P. chlamydosporia with respect to important genes.
As mentioned earlier, the combining of levels was done for statistical reasons and resulted from the extremely low number of responses but might have limited the discriminative ability of the EQ-5D.
As an exploratory analysis, no corrections were done for multiple statistical testing, which should be considered when interpreting the results.
All calculations were done for 80% statistical power at an alpha level of 0.05, suggesting that the study is sufficiently powered for detecting increased health knowledge, and increased minutes of leisure time MVPA.
This was decided on in advance, and was done for the purpose of statistical analysis in order to prevent excessive skewing of results by outliers.
This was done for practical, logistical and statistical efficiency reasons depending on organisational or geographical structures in the countries.
Conclusions: Modest associations between early lead exposure and fine motor and visual motor functioning appear even after statistical adjustment is done for other contributors to motor development.
Finally, in the improve phase, statistical analysis was done for identifying the process capability index value which was improved after taking corrective actions.
This statistical analysis was done for both the CDI and CEM tasks by taking 1,000 bootstrapped samples from all 2,478 articles in the test set that had annotations.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com