Sentence examples for be derivable from from inspiring English sources

Nature as a designer can only work through evolution; one structure by definition has to be derivable from another.

If this goes through, the whole metric system will for the first time be derivable from natural phenomena.

This suggests a stronger requirement on a formal system of logic namely, that p be derivable from X by the system whenever X logically entails p. The usual systems of logic satisfy this requirement because, besides the completeness theorem, there is also a compactness theorem: A theory X has a model if every finite subset of X has a model.

Many phenomenological models, while failing to be derivable from a theory, incorporate principles and laws associated with theories.

We might instead have required that Pα[(A·~A) | (A∨~A)] < 1; but this turns out to be derivable from Rule (1) together with the other rules.

Nagel's first formal requirements was that the "laws" of the reduced theory must be derivable from the laws and associated coordinating definitions of the reducing theory.

If such a derivation exists, we say E is derivable from F. Intuitionistic propositional logic IPC is the subtheory which results when the language is restricted to formulas built from proposition letters P, Q, R,… using the propositional connectives &, ∨, → and ¬, and only the propositional postulates are used.

One way to answer the question in the affirmative would be to show that at least one of the 13 known single axioms is derivable from XCB alone; another approach would be to derive from XCB the 3-axiom set (E1)–(E1).

Three formal worries of the Nagel model merit mention: if reduction is derivation plus (sometimes) bridge laws, then any theory would reduce to itself (because any theory is derivable from itself); moreover, any theory would reduce to any inconsistent theory; and contrary to what one might expect, reduction would not turn out to be an asymmetric relation derivability does not entail asymmetry.

Instead of regarding existence as a predicate (2 70 4), Kant derives necessary existence from possibility (2 77 84)[26] The bond governing nature is derivable from its intelligible possibility, and not from any anthropological story nor from the notion of a necessary being.

So in the second edition Ayer amended the principle to read: a statement is directly verifiable if it is either an observation statement or is such that an observation statement is derivable from it in conjunction with another observation statement (or observation statements), such derivability not being possible from the conjoined observation statement(s) alone.