Sentence examples for be cost effective on from inspiring English sources

Unlike previous analyses, however, we found that the addition of a proton pump inhibitor to both traditional NSAIDs and COX 2 selective inhibitors was likely to be cost effective on the basis of the latest data and prices.

Furthermore, with the population of China exceeding 1 billion, clinical, surgical or pharmacological solutions would not likely be cost effective on such a vast population-wide scale, especially given disparities in economic resources and medical access across subpopulations and regions of China [ 81- 84].

Under base case assumptions, surgery is cost effective on average with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £2648 per quality adjusted life year.

Hardware implementations can be done very fast and are cost effective on reconfigurable devices such as FPGAs.

Classically, we see this occur in office design where the designers think that everything is fine; the space is cost effective (on budget), it looks good (aesthetics and ambiance) and it meets the requirements (includes everything needed).

The services tend to be cost-effective on the short term compared to traditional care.

Changing the social environment is feasible and could be cost-effective on a large scale.

In all our analyses varicella vaccination would be cost-effective on a short time-scale of less than 20 years, when potential negative effects on HZ incidence are not yet felt.

Notably, the abovementioned studies for the UK (van Hoek et al., 2012) and Belgium (Bilcke et al., 2013) also found that combining paediatric varicella vaccination with HZ vaccination of the elderly would be cost-effective on the long run.

We conclude that an intervention to increase nurse staffing to recommended levels for short-stay patients would not be cost-effective on the basis of reduction in hospital transfer rates alone.

While strategies such as phone calls and home visits can produce modest increases in breast cancer screening uptake, these efforts are labour intensive and may not be cost-effective on a population-wide scale in the United Kingdom (Kearins et al, 2009).