Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(5)
Limitations: This study should be considered preliminary given the small sample size investigated and the open-label design.
Our results should be considered preliminary, given the small numbers and the fact that a single operator performed the ultrasounds.
However, these associations must be considered preliminary given the absence of a significant global test result.
These findings should be considered preliminary given that the clustering solution still requires replication in another sample of OA patients.
However, the present results concerning the role of 5-HTTLPR must be considered preliminary given the paucity of S as well as L homozygote's in our sample.
Similar(54)
Considering also that the various genome projects are are in different states of completion, the nomenclature given here to the ORFs should be considered preliminary.
Given these limitations, these results should be considered preliminary and future studies should be well designed and should include larger numbers of participants.
Given the weaknesses of the reviewed studies, the present findings should be considered preliminary and indicative of the need for future research.
Given these limitations, the models generated here must be considered preliminary and incomplete.
Given the small sample size, these results should be considered preliminary until replicated in a larger population.
Given the small number of patients, this finding must be considered preliminary.
More suggestions(15)
be considered overwhelming given
be considered desirable given
be considered credible given
be considered minor given
be considered small given
be considered barbaric given
be considered canonical given
be considered conservative given
be considered positive given
be considered 'incidental given
be considered satisfactory given
be considered surprising given
be considered worthy given
be considered uncommon given
be considered reasonable given
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com