Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(9)
The averaging method was shown to be sufficiently accurate for this analysis even when the non-linearities could not be considered as weak.
It is debatable, whether the signals we found could be considered as weak.
With these caveats in mind, effects smaller than 50% should be considered as weak.
As an outcome of fuzzy decision rules, the node status can be considered as weak, normal, and strong.
Among the 14 MOA-cliffs, there are 13 MMPs to be considered as weak MOA-cliffs because they just show partly different MOA.
From a theoretical point of view, physisorption can be considered as weak interaction arising due to two types of forces, namely, dispersion forces and/or classical electrostatic ones.
Similar(51)
Flavonoids from medicinal plants are considered as weak phytoestrogens to able to mimic the effects of estrogen.
In particular, EDR and IDU are considered as weak nodes since they have SCR lower than 3, as shown in Table 5 in the column "n = 0".
Varimax factor loading coefficient with a correlation of: >0.75 are explained as strong significant factor loading (FL); 0.75 0.50 are considered as moderate FL; and 0.50 0.30 are considered as weak FL.
Branches with posterior probabilities (PP) below 0.8 were considered as weak, between 0.8 and 0.95 as moderate, and above 0.95 as strong.
All correlations were considered as weak or very weak.
More suggestions(16)
be considered as frictional
be painted as weak
be read as weak
be considered as limited
be considered as language-insensitive
be denounced as weak
be stereotyped as weak
be described as weak
be attacked as weak
be considered as positive
be considered as ellipsoid
be seen as weak
be judged as weak
be considered as non-hazardous
be considered as synthetic
be portrayed as weak
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com