Suggestions(2)
Similar(60)
Univariate comparisons between groups will be conducted using chi-square test for equal proportion (or Fisher's exact tests where numbers are small) and reported as numbers and percentages.
Univariate comparisons between the two study groups with respect to outcome measures and covariates at baseline will be conducted using Chi-square tests for categorical variables, Kruskal-Wallis tests for ordinal variables, and linear mixed models for continuous variables.
Statistical tests were conducted using chi squared test with Yates' correction and 95% confidence intervals unless stated.
For all other variables, significance testing was conducted using Chi square analyses.
Association of the study participants' sociodemographic and behavioral risk factors by sex was conducted using chi square tests for significance.
Tests of association between genetic variants and SA were conducted using Chi squared and Armitage Trend tests.
Bivariate analyses were conducted using Chi Squares (Cramer's V and Phi) as well as T-tests, one-way ANOVAs, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis H. Kruskal-Wallis H
Comparisons between those who were victims of a violent offence (VVO) and those who were not victims of a violence offence (NVVO) were conducted using chi squared analyses and independent t tests as appropriate.
Univariate comparisons for male versus female, and those that had, versus those who had not, experienced alcohol-related non-consensual sex were conducted using chi square analyses because data were categorical.
Uni-variate analysis of the association between psychological distress and categorical data was conducted using Chi square (Fisher's two-sided exact test was used if numbers in the cells <5), while for continuous data Mann–Whitney test was used (non-normal distribution of data).
Univariate analysis of dichotomous data was conducted using Chi-square tests while continuous data were analyzed using Student's t-test or Mann–Whitney U test as appropriate.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com