be complex enough to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "be complex enough to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing a requirement for something to have a certain level of complexity to achieve a specific purpose or function. Example: "The software must be complex enough to handle multiple user requests simultaneously without crashing."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

11 human-written examples

And a Scrabble endgame can be complex enough to be reminiscent of chess.

The New York Times

Clearly this is an actor with intellectual and emotional energy to burn, and the role of Ben Gideon, while it isn't exactly Hamlet, appears to be complex enough to keep Mr. Braugher's fires fed for now.

The New York Times - Arts

The TBC model has proven to be complex enough to grasp the important reactive processes.

Journal of Contaminant Hydrology

Similarly an aspect can be complex enough to have lower order of aspects forming a hierarchy.

Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling

Further, the model must demonstrate the same patterns of behaviour as the real system, and need only be complex enough to meet this objective.

Minerals Engineering

In contrast, the phase flows have to be complex enough to endow the functional modes with the existence of separatrices and (potentially) multistability, which is achieved via the introduction of nonlinearities.

Plosone

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

48 human-written examples

Some are complex enough to be worthy of Wall Street.

The Guardian - Opinion

The dynamics of those innumerable little rearrangements is complex enough to keep any physicist happy.

The New York Times

The web of real-life connections here is complex enough to fill out its own rock family tree.

The Guardian - Music

Punch Brothers Virtuosity leads to a temptation: to write music that's complex enough to need every bit of skill.

The New York Times - Arts

You can talk to an expert about the kind of layout you want and ask whether it is complex enough to be worth going digital.

The New York Times - Tech

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "be complex enough to", ensure that the context clearly indicates what the complexity is intended to achieve. For example, instead of saying "The algorithm must be complex enough", specify "The algorithm must "be complex enough to" handle real-time data processing".

Common error

Avoid using "be complex enough to" when simpler solutions would suffice. Over-complicating a task can lead to inefficiencies and unnecessary challenges. Always assess whether the level of complexity is truly warranted by the requirements.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "be complex enough to" functions as an adjectival phrase that modifies a noun or pronoun, specifying a required degree of complexity for a particular purpose or outcome. As Ludwig AI highlights, it is used to describe the necessary level of sophistication or intricacy. Examples show it applying to algorithms, models, systems, and even personal characteristics.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

44%

News & Media

44%

Wiki

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "be complex enough to" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression that specifies the level of intricacy needed for a particular purpose. According to Ludwig AI, it's considered correct and usable. Predominantly found in scientific and news contexts, its usage conveys the necessity of a certain degree of complexity. For effective writing, it's best to clearly state the goal that the complexity aims to achieve and avoid overstating the complexity without a valid reason. Remember, various alternatives like "be sufficiently intricate to" or "be sophisticated enough to" can be used to add nuance to your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

be sufficiently intricate to

This alternative emphasizes the level of detail and intricacy required.

be elaborate enough to

This suggests a high degree of detail and design is needed.

be sophisticated enough to

This alternative highlights the need for advanced or refined complexity.

be intricate enough to

Focuses specifically on the detailed and complicated nature required.

possess sufficient complexity to

This alternative emphasizes the capability derived from having enough complexity.

have enough intricacy to

Highlights the quantity of detail needed.

be involved enough to

This alternative suggests that a high level of participation or engagement is necessary.

be comprehensive enough to

Indicates the need for thoroughness and completeness in complexity.

have the required complexity to

Emphasizes the necessity of a specific level of complexity.

be detailed enough to

Highlights the level of detail needed to achieve a specific outcome.

FAQs

How can I use "be complex enough to" in a sentence?

You can use "be complex enough to" to describe the required level of sophistication for a system or process. For example, "The model must "be complex enough to" accurately predict market trends."

What are some alternatives to "be complex enough to"?

Alternatives include "be sufficiently intricate to", "be elaborate enough to", or "be sophisticated enough to" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "be complex enough to" or "have enough complexity to"?

Both "be complex enough to" and "have enough complexity to" are grammatically correct and convey a similar meaning. The choice depends on the specific sentence structure and desired emphasis.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "be complex enough to"?

Use "be complex enough to" when you want to emphasize that a certain level of complexity is necessary to achieve a particular goal or outcome. For example, "The security system needs to "be complex enough to" deter potential intruders".