Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
This exploratory process generated several classifiers, the performance of which had to be compared using our test set of functional protein relationships (see Methods).
Similar(58)
The average patient A of the Caprie study and our patient B are compared using our definition of fuzzy similarity and fuzzy comparison, F Sim (A, B) and F Comp (A, B).
Four C sources were compared using our previous method(15) and our optimized method.
Variants were annotated and sample calls were compared using our custom cloud based analysis platform seqplorer (http://www.seqplorer.org) (De Wilde et al., in preparation).
To ascertain the in vivo relevance of the PCNA-independent D-loop extension by DNA polymerase η, the expression effects of wild-type and PCNA-binding-deficient Pol η (PIP1, PIP2 mutant) [27] were compared using our HR reporter system.
Sizes can be compared using a straightforward calculation.
Treatment groups will be compared using intent-to-treat analysis.
Our approach was compared using the genomic biomarkers selected by the Monte Carlo Cross-Validation.
Our approach was compared using the genomic biomarkers selected by the Monte Carlo Cross-Validation: transcription factors (TF) and miRNAs from DEA. Step 1: Differential Expression Analysis.
In vitro data were compared using a one-way ANOVA.
Individual means were compared using multiple t tests.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com