Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
A Pax3 GFP/+ mouse line [ 6] permitted isolation of Pax3-GFP progenitor cells by flow cytometry, so that the transcriptomes of purified populations of Pax3 GFP/ + versus Pax3 PAX3-FKHR/GFP could could be compared by microarray analysis.
Similar(59)
RNA was prepared from the ventricles of postnatal day 17 miR-499 transgenic mice or littermate controls, and gene expression was compared by microarray analysis (Fig. 5A).
To explore the inventory of HrpL-regulated genes in 3937, the transcriptome profile differences between wild-type 3937 and a hrpL mutant WPP96 (Supplementary Table S1) were compared by microarray analysis.
Spat with and without detectable OsHV-1 infection presenting or not mortality respectively were compared by microarray during mortality episodes.
Here, an in vitro Wolbachia infection was generated in the Drosophila S2 cell line, and transcription profiles of infected and uninfected cells were compared by microarray.
The transcriptomes of mature, fully light-exposed leaves of soil grown P. euphratica and P. × canescens plants were compared by microarray analysis on GeneChip Poplar Genome arrays.
Three pools each of four individual precocious testes were compared by microarray analysis to three pools of ten pooled non-precocious testes.
The effect of the different treatments on transcription profiles of HaCaT cells was compared by microarray analysis (whole genome human 44K array, Agilent Technologies, Böblingen, Germany).
To obtain a global view of NuRD-mediated transcriptional regulation, gene expression profiles of wild-type and Mbd3-null ES cells were compared by microarray analysis.
Therefore, the genome wide transcriptional changes of ATCC 17978 grown in MH medium and MH supplemented with 200 μM DIP during mid log-phase were compared by microarray analysis.
This will provide clues to the physiological differences between iron efficient and inefficient cultivars Transcript levels of near isogenic soybeans, Clark (Fe-efficient) (PI 548533) and IsoClark (Fe-inefficient) (PI 547430) were compared by microarray analysis.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com