be categorised with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "be categorised with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the classification or grouping of items, people, or concepts based on shared characteristics or criteria. Example: "In the study, various species of birds were found to be categorised with other migratory birds."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

But summer can be categorised with other indicators of assumed success – work, family, happiness – it is easy to assume everyone else is doing it right.

The Guardian - Opinion

Pinter should be categorised with former winners Pearl S Buck, Rabindranath Tagore, Bertrand Russell and Winston Churchill - whose literary works are now almost completely unread.

The Guardian - Books

Properly, male circumcision should be categorised with a host of ritual crimes against children, including facial scarring and forced marriage, force-feeding and tooth extraction, which are usually summarised as harmful traditional practices and suppressed, whatever the religious or cultural arguments.

The Guardian - Opinion

A total of 1389 (58%) tumours could not be categorised with the SDs.

British Journal of Cancer

Some of the virulence-related transcripts which could not be categorised with the InterProScan data were categorised using the information from the Gene Ontology, UniProt, NCBI and referred publications.

BMC Genomics

Data are unlikely to be missing at random; 16 therefore, no attempt will be made to impute numeric missing data, and continuous variables will be categorised with an additional 'missing' category included.

BMJ Open

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

Despite this, everywhere you look, frittatas are categorised with, or referred to as, omelettes.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Two weeks ago the Guardian revealed that the ISI had been categorised with al-Qaida, Hamas, Lebanese Hezbollah and other militant Islamic groups in a 2007 "threat matrix" compiled to help interrogators at Guantánamo Bay.

The Guardian

Organ dysfunction was categorised with 24-hour Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores.

Critical Care

Very few men (< 1% of omnivores) were categorised with biochemical folate deficiency (< 6.3 nmol/l).

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

For further detailed analysis, patients and controls were categorised with respect to height and BMI, respectively.

British Journal of Cancer

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "be categorised with" when you want to explicitly indicate that something is being placed into a group based on shared characteristics or criteria. This phrase is useful when you need to emphasize the act of classification itself.

Common error

Avoid using "be categorised with" when a simpler association is sufficient. For instance, instead of saying "This book is categorised with classics", consider "This book is considered a classic" if you simply want to express its status.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "be categorised with" functions as a passive voice construction used to indicate that a subject is being placed into a specific category or group. As Ludwig AI suggests, this implies a classification process based on shared attributes or criteria, as demonstrated in examples from various scientific and media contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "be categorised with" is a grammatically correct passive voice phrase used to indicate that something is being placed into a specific group or category based on shared characteristics. Ludwig AI confirms its usability across various contexts, particularly in science and news media. While there are several alternatives like "be classified with" or "be grouped with", the choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey. When using this phrase, ensure that the classification is explicit and based on well-defined criteria to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

be classified with

Focuses on the act of classification, emphasizing a systematic grouping.

be grouped with

Highlights the formation of a group or cluster based on shared attributes.

be associated with

Emphasizes a connection or relationship rather than strict categorization.

be identified with

Suggests a process of recognition and linkage based on specific traits.

be linked to

Highlights a direct connection or association between items.

be considered as

Implies a judgment or opinion about how something should be categorized.

be labeled as

Focuses on the act of assigning a specific label or designation.

be placed in the same category as

Emphasizes the act of putting something into a specific category.

be ranked with

Refers to placing something in a specific order or level with others.

be indexed under

Highlights a structured system for organizing and locating information.

FAQs

How can I use "be categorised with" in a sentence?

Use "be categorised with" to show that something belongs to a specific group because it shares certain qualities or characteristics. For example: "These findings can "be categorised with" other studies on climate change".

What are some alternatives to "be categorised with"?

Alternatives include "be classified with", "be grouped with", or "be associated with", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "categorised with" or "classified with"?

"Categorised with" and "classified with" are often interchangeable, but "classified with" might imply a more formal or systematic arrangement. Both are valid, but consider the context. You might decide the choice also taking into account the audience of your content.

What is the difference between "be categorised with" and "be associated with"?

"Be categorised with" implies a direct grouping based on shared features, while "be associated with" suggests a less direct relationship or connection that might not require shared characteristics. It depends on how important the shared features are.