Sentence examples for be better at estimating from inspiring English sources

By including more detailed variables we hypothesise that the QFractureScores will be better at estimating risk for the individual patient by taking account of more information regarding the patient's history.

The Arrhenius based function, was better at estimating the early age strengths as it assumes that the concrete strength gain rate varies exponentially with temperature.

Children with Tourette's Syndrome, for example, who need to use the pre-frontal cortex just behind the forehead to help them control their tics, are better at estimating intervals of just over a second than other children.

First, insurers know a lot more about the individual market's demographics now than they did a year ago, so they're better at estimating their costs.

Women were better at estimating food portion sizes than men.

However, when assayed by the CCC, the Euclidean method was better at estimating the branch lengths.

The same conclusion can be reached by OLS (slope = 0.566), despite the fact that SMA is better at estimating the slope.

For example, the FI was better than PV30 at estimating the status of reproductive physiology while the IV30 was better at estimating the management efficiency, but could not be used to estimate the reproductive physiology since it could not discriminate between the different groups of reproductive physiology.

In agreement with the conclusions of Dioum et al., most of the published equations that were tested against FFM measured using isotope dilution in the present study gave comparable estimates of concordance, bias and error; our own equations were better at estimating FFM, although not dramatically.

Second, in placental mammals, the relationship between Kr/Kc and LHT is stronger that the relationship with d N/d S (compare tables 1 and 3), further suggesting that the RadConsAA model, despite its increased overall parameterization, is better at estimating the rate of fixation of slightly deleterious mutations in mitochondrial sequences.

This study also found that group-level (intervention vs control) estimates were better at predicting long-term (18 months) exposure using measured subject characteristics to explain between-subject variation.