Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
This may be because this study presented the options as potentially available and therefore obtained a better view of acceptability if barriers of access and cost are removed.
The sampling differences between the current study and previous studies (particularly the proportion of females) may be because this study only included patients with NVAF who were also receiving VKA treatment.
The findings from this study differ from the results of the Kovacs and Paulauskas [ 12] study, which did not find a significant relationship between developmental level and depressive symptoms, which may be because this study had participants with a larger age range.
This could be because this study was conducted among rural adolescents who may still be influenced strongly by cultural values in contrast to the adolescents in the GYTS study who live in urban areas and are becoming more westernized in their lifestyle.
The lower proportion of TST positive (2% of participants i.e. N = 133) when we use the 20 mm cutoff in our data set could be because this study was limited to school-going children who may be healthier than those in the general population.
Similar(55)
This is because, in this study we aim to explore structural differences in PCNs classified as high and low in terms of hospitalisation cost and readmission rate.
This is because this study has focused on carbonate source-rock samples while the relationship reported by Hakami et al. (2016) was developed for a carbonate source-rock reservoir in Saudi Arabia.
This is because this study focuses on patients that received at least 72 h of PCA treatment.
This is not valid for high outliers, may be because in this study theyalso represent the highest volume hospitals.
The first reason a design-based research approach was adopted in this study is because this research study was situated in real educational context (assessment feedback and mobile learning in higher education).
This may be because the studies identified are predominately from the USA.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com