be ascertained with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "be ascertained with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is likely intended to convey the idea of determining or finding out something, but the preposition "with" is not appropriate in this context. Example: "The results of the experiment must be ascertained before proceeding to the next phase."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

50 human-written examples

These voters should not be disfranchised where their intent may be ascertained with reasonable certainty, simply because the chad they punched did not completely dislodge from the ballot.

The New York Times

It hinted broadly that dimpled chads should be counted, quoting an Illinois Supreme Court opinion declaring that "voters should not be disfranchised where their intent may be ascertained with reasonable certainty".

The New York Times

But the power of reason to prove much of what we know is weak, and Hume denied that our beliefs about the world could be ascertained with anything like scientific certainty.

The New Yorker

It is that contrary to what you may have gleaned from the literary deconstructionists, there is a truth, and if it can't be ascertained with total assurance, it can certainly be closely approached, like the calculus approaching the curve.

The New York Times - Books

Our courts have repeatedly held that, where the intention of the voter can be ascertained with reasonable certainty from his ballot, that intention will be given effect even though the ballot is not strictly in conformity with the law...

The New York Times

Only four of the cases were prosecuted because it could not be ascertained with three of the corpses whether they had been alive when they were born because they were so badly composed.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

10 human-written examples

Assuming further that missense mutations and nonsense mutations are ascertained with an equal probability, the ascertainment depth of missense mutations is Sn/ Tn.

Genome Biology and Evolution

The reduction of substrate was ascertained with XRD, FTIR and XPS analysis.

Separation and Purification Technology

Survival distributions were estimated by the Kaplan Meier method, and the significance of differences between survival rates was ascertained with the log-rank test.

Nature

The sample size was 22. Dentin sensitivity was ascertained with an accurate cold testing device that slowly decreased in temperature.

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Under the specified condition, the optimal operating parameters are ascertained, with the optimal pinch point temperature difference of 5 K.

Energy

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity and grammatical correctness, replace "be ascertained with" with stronger alternatives like "be determined by" or "be established through" to ensure more precise and standard English usage.

Common error

Avoid using "with" when the intended meaning is "by" or "through". "With" typically indicates accompaniment, while "by" indicates agency and "through" indicates means. For example, instead of "the cause was ascertained with tests", say "the cause was ascertained by tests" or "the cause was ascertained through tests".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "be ascertained with" functions as part of a passive construction where an attempt is made to describe how something is determined or established. However, as Ludwig AI points out, the use of "with" is grammatically questionable in this context.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

33%

Academia

17%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "be ascertained with" appears in a variety of sources, including scientific, news, and academic contexts, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. Standard English prefers alternatives such as "be ascertained by" or "be ascertained through". The phrase aims to describe how information is determined or confirmed, but its non-standard usage lowers its suitability for formal writing. The sources where it is found have high authority overall, but the grammatical error impacts the reliability of the phrase. When writing, it is best to opt for grammatically sound alternatives to clearly and correctly convey the intended meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

be determined by

Emphasizes that something is decided or influenced by a specific factor.

be established through

Highlights the process or method used to confirm something.

be identified using

Focuses on the tools or techniques used for identification.

be verified by

Stresses the confirmation of something through evidence.

be confirmed via

Similar to 'verified by', but suggests a specific channel or method of confirmation.

be assessed through

Highlights the evaluation or measurement process.

be measured with

Focuses on using a tool or method for quantification.

be found using

Suggests the discovery of something through a particular means.

be known from

Indicates that information is derived from a specific source.

be learned through

Emphasizes the process of gaining knowledge or understanding.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "be ascertained with"?

Alternatives include "be determined by", "be established through", or "be identified using", depending on the context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "be ascertained with"?

No, "be ascertained with" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. It's better to use alternatives like "be ascertained by" or "be ascertained through".

How can I use "be ascertained" correctly in a sentence?

Use "be ascertained" with prepositions like "by" or "through" to indicate the means or method of ascertaining. For example, "The truth can be ascertained by careful investigation" or "The results were ascertained through rigorous testing".

What is the difference between "be ascertained by" and "be ascertained with"?

"Be ascertained by" indicates the agent or method used to determine something, while "be ascertained with" is grammatically incorrect. The correct usage emphasizes the means or authority through which something is confirmed.