Sentence examples for be argued that differences from inspiring English sources

First, it could be argued that differences arose because we used the maximal airway pressure instead of the plateau pressure.

It can be argued that differences in effect have to do with the time component.

It could be argued that differences in genetic diversity between breeds are the result of differences in population size.

It could be argued that differences in RSR were due to non-linear allometric allocation dependent on plant size (e.g. Shipley and Meziane 2002).

Thirdly, the mean age of the smokers' group was greater than that of the control group and it could be argued that differences between smokers and never-smokers are due to the age difference.

Since it was not practical to collect specimens in a controlled manner, it could be argued that differences in fixation technique could affect the fluorescence intensity of the immunostaining.

It is argued that differences of this magnitude are avoidable, and it is recommended that the developers apply Item Response Theory to the preparation of tests in order to more reliably distinguish between those test takers whose English ability is deemed sufficient to carry out the tasks of a professional tour guide from those whose is not.

It was argued that differences in the decision-making process between referees are possibly due to the ability to extract better quality information per fixation and the ability to acquire information more effectively via peripheral vision (Catteeuw et al., 2009; Hancock & Ste-Marie, 2013).

Finally, it has been argued that differences in nonword repetition ability derive from factors quite external to a putative phonological loop: factors such as pre-existing differences in vocabulary, knowledge of phonotactic probabilities or differences in speech production ability [e.g., 34] [36].

It has been argued that differences in health perceptions could undermine the validity of cross-national comparisons which are based on self-reported measures 53, 54.

It has been argued that differences within organizations, between professional groups and hospital managers about how to improve quality may impede the successful implementation of quality programs [ 1].