Even when caution must be applied when comparing animal studies with human data, these studies give further evidence of the potential effect of BBP on human health.
As new 'natural experiment' opportunities arise, several lessons learned from these studies should be applied when planning a new accountability study.
These methods either can only be applied when the differential equation being studied has a closed form solution or can become very computationally intensive when applying it to a system that can only be solved numerically and hence require optimisation algorithms.
However, caution should be applied when comparing effect sizes between studies and head-to-head studies are required for more meaningful comparisons.
Caution should be applied when interpreting the findings: our study is based on a group of long-distance adult students aspiring to improve their modest socioeconomic circumstances.
Sepsis was not predefined, and so caution should be applied when making comparisons with other studies, especially as the proportion of patients who died did not differ in the sepsis and nonsepsis cohorts.
Caution must be applied when comparing reports from different studies as varying case definitions (present/absent or mild/moderate/severe) and means of diagnosing HV (i.e. self-reported or diagnosed by an examiner) are used [ 2].
