Sentence examples for be an artifact because from inspiring English sources

That is, the constancy of bacterial biomass with depth that we observed here could be an artifact because the cell volumes were not measured directly at all depths.

The shorter average and median lengths of the NR sequences is not necessarily an inherent characteristic of T. gondii proteins but could be an artifact because the researched proteins are likely not a representative sample of the T. gondii proteome.

On the other hand, cancer pathways may also be an artifact because a substantial number of proteins are in the overlap between the cancer-related pathways and the essential pathways.

However, this turned out to be an artifact because it changed an amino acid in the amino-terminal end of the pro-peptide that was measured by their original assay kit.

With regard to the B1 retroposon study, the position of Castoridae presented by Veniaminova et al. [ 35] may be an artifact, because analysis of SINE insertion loci in rodents supports the monophyly of the mouse-related clade [ 36].

The rarity of identified SINEs may be an artifact because SINEs are often difficult to classify due to their short length, rapid evolution, and turnover and because they do not encode proteins.

Furthermore, immunolabeled HA-tagged IN revealed a similar reduction in nuclear IN content compared to cytoplasmic PICs (Supplementary Fig. S7 and Supplementary Table S4), excluding the possibility that the reduced nuclear IN content is an artifact because of the bulky eGFP tag.

However, this was an artifact because fast stochastic switches between directions were beyond the scope of the time resolution and therefore undetectable.

Wall area is an artifact, because as microcosms are scaled down wall area per unit volume increases, which may affect composition of the microbial community and increase dominance of periphyton [ 3].

Nevertheless, our results are unlikely to be an artifact of misorientation because the inferred probability of misorientation in our data are 0.078% (0.062% for age-1 ) (Baudry and Depaulis 2003).

The change in the ORs with mutual adjustment did not appear to be an artifact of collinearity because the precision of the mutually adjusted model was not substantially lower than the single exposure model (e.g., CI widths for an IQR change in PM2.5 during pregnancy of 2.3 vs. 1.7, respectively).