Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
A SPAAT score ≥3 predicting a CCR2/3 resection would be a true negative.
TST has been shown to be unreliable in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease, and although a positive test may be useful for LTBI diagnosis, a negative one cannot be assumed to be a true negative [ 8, 10, 11].
Put another way, if all the lymph nodes in a patient are uninvolved by tumor, it does not matter which nodes the surgeon removes the result will be a true negative.
Candida skin tests were conducted because, when positive, they confirm that the person can mount a cutaneous hypersensitivity reaction, which clarifies that a simultaneous negative TB skin-test result is likely to be a true negative.
All samples were collected and analysed in the same rigorous manner and we doubt that this is an artefact and consider that it is likely to be a true negative.
Studies of such treatments have reported zero, or small treatment effects; This result may be a "true negative", but it could also arise due to inadequate treatment dosage or the inability to target specifically the physical and psychological impairments associated with whiplash injuries [ 10].
Similar(53)
If it did not, it is a true negative (TN).
Contrariwise, a negative sample is a true negative one if its ROI contains only background feature points or a very limited number of foreground ones.
The aforementioned lack of refinement is a true negative, however, and unless you're a by-any-means-necessary sort of enthusiast, you're apt to find the WRX short on breeding.
Moreover, and of perhaps greatest importance – the subject group has already been used to uncover longevity loci in the genome [22] [25], giving still further confidence that a negative result for a variant or locus of interest is a true negative.
Sensitivity is defined as TP/ TP+FN) and specificity is TN/ TN+FP), where TP is a true positive, FN is a false negative, TN is a true negative, and FP is a false positive.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com