be a source of destablization

USAGE SUMMARY

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

"It could be a source of destablization in certain parts of the Arab world".

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

– might be a source of motivation.

Independent

"It should be a source of shame".

BBC

Be a source of cheer.

WikiHow

Be a source of positivity.

WikiHow

Be a source of good information.

WikiHow

"It's a source of stability".

The New York Times

"This is a source of pain".

The New York Times

The irony is a source of bitterness.

The New Yorker

It's a source of embarrassment".

The New York Times

"It's a source of information.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "be a source of destabilization", consider the specific context and ensure that the wording accurately reflects the degree and nature of the impact. Provide concrete examples or explanations to support your assertion.

Common error

Avoid using "be a source of destabilization" when the action or event only has a minor or indirect effect on stability. Overstating the impact can diminish the credibility of your statement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "be a source of destabilization" functions as a predicate nominative, identifying the subject as something that causes instability. The example from Ludwig illustrates its use in political analysis, indicating potential negative consequences.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "be a source of destabilization" is used to describe something that contributes to making a situation or region unstable. Ludwig's analysis shows that it functions as a predicate nominative. The examples shows it appearing in news contexts. The phrase is of neutral register and relatively rare and is most likely to be found in news reports that offer political analysis. Given the analysis, when using this phrase, be sure to consider the specific context and ensure that the wording accurately reflects the degree and nature of the impact, and avoid overstating it.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

cause destabilization

Directly indicates the action of causing instability.

contribute to instability

Suggests a less direct role in creating instability.

fuel instability

Implies adding energy or intensity to existing instability.

exacerbate instability

Highlights the worsening of already present instability.

promote instability

Focuses on actively encouraging or fostering instability.

lead to destabilization

Indicates a consequential relationship where the phrase results in instability.

undermine stability

Suggests weakening or eroding existing stability.

threaten stability

Presents the phrase as a danger to the current stability.

create a risk of destabilization

Highlights the potential for instability to occur.

foment unrest

Suggests inciting public discontent and disturbance.

FAQs

How can I use "be a source of destabilization" in a sentence?

The phrase "be a source of destabilization" is used to describe something that contributes to making a situation or region unstable. For example: "The new policy could "cause destabilization" in the region."

What are some alternatives to "be a source of destabilization"?

You can use alternatives like "contribute to instability", "fuel instability", or "undermine stability" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

What does it mean for something to "be a source of destabilization"?

When something "be a source of destabilization", it means that it is one of the factors that is making a situation less stable and more prone to problems like unrest, conflict, or collapse.

Is it better to say "cause destabilization" or "be a source of destabilization"?

Both ""cause destabilization"" and "be a source of destabilization" are valid, but they have slightly different nuances. "Cause destabilization" implies a more direct and immediate effect, while "be a source of destabilization" suggests a contributing factor among others.