Once a scoring event is generated and assigned, that team's score is incremented by a point value drawn iid from the empirical distribution of point values per scoring event for the sport (see Additional file 1, Appendix B).
In the second (Markov), a scoring event is awarded to the leading team with the empirically estimated probability for the current lead size L (shown in Figure 5).
The scoring balance between teams - how often a team wins a scoring event - is well-described by a common Bernoulli process, with a bias parameter that varies effectively over gameplay and across sports.
The end of a scoring period often requires players to reset their positions, and any effort spent establishing an advantageous player configuration is lost unless that play produces a scoring event.
Only proteins that met the following criteria were accepted as unambiguously identified: 1) MASCOT score >76 (probability-based MOWSE score: -10*log(P), where P is the probability that the observed match is a random event; score > 76 indicate identity or extensive homology (P < 0 · 05)).
Score is -10*log (p), where p is the probability that the observed match is a random event, Protein scores greater than 51 are considered to be significant (p < 0.05).
aIon score is = 10*Log(P) where P is the probability that the observed match is a random event (ion scores > 47 are significant at p < 0.05);% coverage.
Interestingly, it showed that aggravating renal sequential organ failure assessment score was a late event close to death.
Traditionally the total score provided by other questionnaires is taken as the respondent's level of knowledge, however this is an invalid measure as the researcher would not know to what extent the score is a random event and therefore a valid measurement.
Positively identified proteins have been assigned a significant Mascot score based on the probability that the observed match is a random event and protein scores greater than 56 are significant (P < 0.05).
