Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Let H be a restricted triangulation of LG (P ) and let (T, B) be a clique tree of H. Let e={ u, v} be any vertex in LG (P ).
Similar(59)
Thus, e and e′ are not both from LG(T) for any input tree T. Hence, every fill-in edge in LG (P ) F is valid, and LG (P ) F is a restricted triangulation.
Since { e, e′} is not a valid edge, H is not a restricted triangulation, a contradiction.
A profile of unrooted phylogenetic trees is compatible if and only if LG (P ) has a restricted triangulation.
From Theorem 4, there exists a restricted triangulation H of LG (P ).
Let (Im_{h}) be a regular triangulation of Θ̄.
Let T be a regular triangulation of Γ.
The actual data structure here is a Delaunay Triangulation.
Thus H is a minimal triangulation of G ′ (M).
Therefore H is a proper triangulation of G(M).
Thus H ′ is a proper triangulation of G ′ (M), and because H is a proper minimal triangulation of G ′ (M) it must be that H ′ = H.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com