Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
Let X be a paracompact space and Y be a Banach space.
Let ({mathcal{P}}) be the class of polyhedra, (Xin D {mathcal{P}})) be a paracompact space with ({mathcal{E}}(X neq0) and (Gamma :Xrightrightarrows X) be a u.s.c.s.c
Let X be a paracompact space and let Y be a non-empty closed convex subset in a Hausdorff locally convex topological vector space and with the property ( K ).
Corollary 3.4 Let X be a paracompact space, ( Y, D ) be an LD-metric space, and Z be a closed subset of X with dim X Z ≤ 0. If F : X ⊸ Y is an alsc multimap such that F ( x ) is a D -set for all x ∈ X ∖ Z, then for ϵ > 0, F has an ϵ-approximate selection.
Corollary 3.5 Let X be a paracompact space, ( Y, Γ ) be an LC-metric space, and Z be a closed subset of X with dim X Z ≤ 0. If F : X ⊸ Y is an alsc multimap such that F ( x ) is Γ-convex for all x ∈ X ∖ Z, then for ϵ > 0, F has an ϵ-approximate selection.
Let ({mathcal{P}}) be the class of polyhedra and let (Xin D {mathcal{P}})) be a paracompact space with a well-defined non-trivial Euler-Poincaré characteristic ({mathcal{E}}(X)).17 Given any open cover ω of X, then there exists a locally finite polyhedron P such that: (i) P ω-homotopy dominates X, and (ii) ({mathcal{E}}(P)) is well defined and non-trivial. .
Similar(54)
Let X be a paracompact topological space, Y be a normed vector space and T : X → 2 Y be a correspondence having convex values.
Theorem 3.7 Let X be a paracompact topological space, ( Y, D ) be a D-space with a uniformity U, and F : X ⊸ Y be a multimap with D -set values such that F ( X ) is of generalized Zima type.
Theorem 3.10 Let X be a paracompact topological space, ( Y, D ) be an LD-metric space, and Z be a closed subset of X with dim X Z ≤ 0. If F, T : X ⊸ Y are two multimaps such that (1) F and T are topologically separated; (2) T is upper semicontinuous; and (3) F is an alsc multimap such that F ( x ) is a D -set for all x ∈ X ∖ Z. .
Let X be a paracompact topological space, Y be a locally convex topological vector space and let T : X → 2 Y be a correspondence with convex values.
Proposition 3.1 Let X be a paracompact topological space and ℛ be a locally finite open covering of X, ( Y, D ) be a D-space, and η : R → Y be a function.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com