When Kσ was a finite value the reaction was pushed towards the back of the electrode and when Kκ was finite the reaction was pushed towards the front face.
Imitating the explanation of the counterpart of direct users, the second term is a finite value, and the last two terms are smaller than 1.
Hence, ({{mu}_{ij}}) ((i=1,2,ldots,m); (j=1,2,ldots,r)) in A8 can be computed by the corresponding upper limit (if the upper limit is a finite value).
Therefore, η, ({{gamma}_{j}}) ((j=1,2,ldots,m)) in A5 can be calculated by the upper limit (if the corresponding upper limit is a finite value).
In this system we apply the Chebyshev spectral collocation independently in the η direction by choosing (N_{eta}+1) Chebyshev-Gauss-Lobatto points (0=eta_{0}is a finite value that is chosen to be adequately large to approximate the conditions at ∞.
The production rate is (alpha beta) when production starts, where (alpha in left[ {1,k} right]) and k is a finite value greater than 1; but the rate is (beta,) when level crosses above ({text{s}}), i.e., for the level from (s, +, 1,{text{to}}, S).
This contradicts to the assumption that σ is a finite value.
Second, given the normal data N with σ>0 being a finite value, we know that σ≈ b- a)/6→ ∞ as n→ ∞.
Let f z) and g z) be two nonconstant meromorphic functions in a domain D ⊆ C, and let a be a finite complex value.
Let and be two nonconstant meromorphic functions in the whole complex plane, and let be a finite complex value or function.
