The moderate indication was a correct solution to Cupcake Task B (involving operating on the results of a unit coordination) without showing any work to support the unit coordination needed to enumerate the hidden cupcakes.
It is often used in conjunction with convergent thinking, which follows a particular set of logical steps to arrive at one solution, which in some cases is a "correct" solution.
Consequently, more students presented different strategies at school C (both correct and incorrect) than did students at school B. Furthermore, the time spent on discussions of these problems were generally longer at school C than at the other schools (precise time measurements unavailable) because a number of incorrect responses needed to be explained before a correct solution was presented.
Thus, although a minimum amount of time is needed to obtain a correct solution, taking much more time can be indicative of failure and quicker responses of greater success (Goldhammer et al. 2014).
Particularly, we observed (see Fig. 1C): the longer the required solution time for a correct solution was, (i) the higher was the subjective restructuring rating and (ii) the lower was the suddenness feeling.
Subsequently, Ren and Wang [25] pointed out that the algorithm of finding the worst optimal solution (KBW) proposed by Calvete and Galé [24] was not always yield a correct solution, and presented two types of cutting plane methods to compute the best and worst optimal solutions.
Nevertheless, this kind of approach is highly dependent of the prior information that is used and lacks from a correct solution appraisal (nonlinear uncertainty analysis).
Multi-granularity joint computation takes a problem-oriented MGrR as input, and every layers of the MGrR are employed jointly to achieve a correct solution to the problem.
While decision makers can often be supported in their search for a correct solution (e.g. recognizing trends within data by overcoming limited cognitive resources), this is not possible for negotiation problems which inherently contain perceived or real conflicting interests of the participants.
The pseudo-free correlation coefficient for the correct hand was clearly better than for the other hand (82% vs. 55%), indicating that a correct solution had been found.
