Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
The proof is similar when is assumed to be a complete subspace of since.
Let P ( Y ) or f ( Y ) or g ( Y ) be a complete subspace of X. Assume there exists r ∈ [ 0, 1 ) such that, for every x, y ∈ Y, φ ( r ) min { d ( f x, P x ), d ( g y, P y ) } ≤ d ( f x, g y ). implies d ( P x, P y ) ≤ r M ( P ; f x, g y ). Then C ( P, f ) and C ( P, g ) are nonempty.
Similar(58)
TX is a complete subspace of X.
(19) Suppose (g(X)) is a complete subspace of X.
Also, g(X) is a complete subspace of (X, d).
g ( X ) is a complete subspace of X.
If or is a complete subspace of, then and have a unique common fixed point.
If and is a complete subspace of, then and have a unique point of coincidence in.
(4) F ( X × X ) ⊆ g ( X ) and g ( X ) is a complete subspace of X. .
If or is a complete subspace of, then, and have a unique point of coincidence.
If fX is a complete subspace of X, then T and f have a coincidence point.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com