Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Let be a -cyclic contraction of Meir-Keeler type.
Similar(59)
let be a -cyclic -contraction self-mapping, then, (3.2). (3.3).
The following properties hold: (i) let be a -cyclic -contraction self-mapping, then, (3.2) (3.3) where ;.
Thus, if is a -cyclic -contraction, then it is also a contraction of Meir-Keeler type (3.27).
Then, since is a -cyclic -contraction, one gets that (3.28).
Since is a -cyclic -contraction, then it is -cyclic nonexpansive so that ;.
Consider the self-mapping, subject to ;,, and assume that and ; so that is a -cyclic -contraction.
Then, is a -cyclic -contraction self-mapping if ; with ; and, furthermore, (3.1).
It turns out that such a mapping is a -cyclic -contraction if the composed self-mappings on are composed -cyclic -contractions.
Theorem 2.1 Let A and B be nonempty subsets of a metric space ( X, d ) and T : A ∪ B → A ∪ B be an MT -cyclic contraction with respect to φ.
Theorem 3.1 Let A and B be nonempty subsets of a metric space ( X, d ) and T : A ∪ B → A ∪ B be an MT -cyclic contraction with respect to α.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com