Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
The number of LGs corresponded to the basic number of chromosomes in rice bean.
As expected, the SA27063 × SA3054 map was composed of eight linkage groups, in accordance with the basic number of chromosomes in M. truncatula (x = 8).
Cytogenetic studies carried out by Felix and Guerra (2000) and Daviña et al. (2009) considered that Oeceoclades maculata is octaployd, with x = 7 corresponding to the basic number of chromosomes of the tribe.
Further tree life-history features, such as their higher basic number of chromosomes, have also hinted that they might have higher genome-wide recombination rates than herbs or shrubs [ 32, 33].
Melon is a diploid species, with a basic number of chromosomes x = 12 (2x = 2n = 24) and an estimated genome size of 450 to 500 M [ 4], similar in size to the rice genome (419 Mb) [ 5, 6] and about four times the size of the Arabidopsis genome (125 Mb) [ 7].
Melon is a diploid species, with a basic number of chromosomes x = 12 (2x = 2n = 24) and an estimated genome size of 450 to 500 Mb [ 3], similar in size to the rice genome (419 Mb) [ 4, 5] and about three times the size of the Arabidopsis genome (125 Mb) [ 6].
Similar(54)
It was known that S. granulata is polyploid; Redondo et al. (1996) mention 52 chromosomes, and older data give chromosome numbers ranging from 46 to 60 chromosomes, assuming a basic number of x = 8 (Philp, 1934; Darlington and Wylie, 1955).
The species with a chromosome complement of 2 n = 26 is suggested to be the basic number of this genus.
A full list of analyzed genomes and their basic features (genome length, superkingdom, number of chromosomes, number of plasmids, etc). is provided in the Supplementary Table S3.
This theory distinguishes the basic processes of gene mutation and recombination, natural selection, changes in structure and number of chromosomes, and reproductive isolation.
The diploid number of chromosomes is 52.
More suggestions(3)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com