Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Most of these basic approaches do not address the presence of daily variation of traveling speeds in sufficient detail, or even neglect it completely.
Similar(59)
In any case, our basic approach does not require the delimitation of species, since it does not include species-counts or a different treatment of within- and between-species variation.
Therefore, it is important to confirm that the basic assumptions of the MMIB approach do not change if the OFDM mapping model is adapted to FBMC PHY.
The proposed approach does not depend the complex matrix inverse calculation but simply applies a basic vector computation (inner product), which further reduces the computational complexity.
But this approach does not "scale".
However, the approach does not work everywhere.
This approach does not require softening.
Surprisingly, this approach does not work in general: in [14] it is shown that while strict metric betweenness is transitive and hence metric betweenness is (tau )-basic strong transitivity does not necessarily hold.
That approach does not suit you.
"That approach didn't work.
The private insurance approach doesn't work".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com