Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(8)
Gaps and ambiguously aligned bases were excluded from the 55-taxon alignment resulting in 1,486 unambiguously aligned sites.
Seven sequences less than 400 bases were excluded from the analyses, and the mean length of those remaining was 647 bases.
Poor-quality (<15) bases were excluded from error estimation as they had been previously masked with Ns.
Individuals living in institutions such as hospitals, prisons, mental health institutions and military bases were excluded from the study.
Second, although the mismatched bases were excluded from data analysis, they provided an empirical estimate for single-read sequencing error rates.
Also relating to generalizability, the findings presented here apply to older Canadians included in the NPHS sampling frame (for example those living on aboriginal reservations, in remote Northern communities and on military bases were excluded from sampling).
Similar(52)
Sequences with ambiguous bases are excluded from the analysis.
Novel TUs with length < 150 bp or average expression of < 2 reads per base were excluded from further analysis.
The remaining 13% of reads contained one or more deviations in the sample identification tag sequences, contained concatamers or were reads shorter than 100 bases, and were excluded from further analysis.
Reads that did not match primer sequences or had undetermined bases (Ns) were excluded from further analysis.
Nucleotide positions in which no base call was made or in which the forward base call was different from the reverse base call were excluded from further analysis.
More suggestions(17)
basis were excluded from
core were excluded from
bases were lost from
bases were purified from
bases were called from
bases were milled from
bases were clipped from
bases were exchanged from
bases were learned from
bases were synthesized from
bases were identified from
bases were collected from
bases were removed from
bases were sequenced from
bases were determined from
bases were constructed from
bases were synthesised from
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com