Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
For the past 25 years, we have developed the enolase superfamily (ENS) as a paradigm to characterize and understand the structural bases for divergence of function in functionally diverse superfamilies.
Similar(59)
The genomic divergences between willow and poplar illustrated here highlight their divergent evolution since the common genome duplication, which laid the genetic bases for development of their divergence in life history, habit and other traits.
To solve this situation, we performed a second set of runs with a narrower prior distribution for divergence time (based on the clear peak obtained in the first runs).
This confirms that these fastest evolving sites may mislead the phylogenetic inference of position of lycophytes, so we used the phylogenetic tree based on OV-sorted data for divergence time estimation.
Based on the same data, evidence for divergence in time to hatching was found between two of the populations [ 31].
Since a phylotype can include members with up to 1.5% sequence divergence (23 bases for a full 1500 base sequence), multiple reference sequences have been selected where we have sequences diverging by more than 10 bases within a taxon.
In particular, Bufonid mtDNA evolution has been estimated [ 87] at about 1.38% sequence divergence based on divergence for the ND1+tRNA's mitochondrial region between Bufo gargarizans (from the eastern Tibetan Plateau) and Bufo viridis (an European species) and the estimated time for the vicariant event caused by the uplifting of the Tibetan Plateau [ 87].
There's just not much room for divergence, if you read the whole Council".
Taxa pairs for divergence analysis.
We also found weak evidence for genetically based population divergence in return migration timing, with natives returning earlier than non-natives and hybrids intermediate.
In addition to creating structural divergence among the species, duplications provide also the bases for diversification of gene functions.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com