Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(1)
As a limitation of our analyses, only frailty status at baseline was utilized.
Similar(59)
Data from 5,049 participants at the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) cohort baseline (1985 to1986) and follow-up for up to 20 years of individuals without hyperuricemia (defined as a serum urate of 6.8 mg/dL or more) at baseline were utilized.
During trial 1 only one biopsy was obtained, and the baseline blood was utilized for the calculation of resting muscle protein synthesis (see calculation below [1]), whereas during trial 2 and 3 bilateral biopsies were taken to characterize the post-exercise responses.
In the intervention group, baseline data was utilized in two patients.
To evaluate changes in average MBR, the rate of change in average MBR vs. initial baseline value was utilized, as previously described [ 11, 12].
A multiple baseline design across participants was utilized to measure changes in indices of happiness of the participants.
Another limitation was that no overall treatment evaluation of symptoms (comparing symptoms at baseline and after treatment) was utilized.
A multiple baseline across student interventionists design was utilized to evaluate the integrity with which trained peers implemented the DTT protocol and the efficacy of the student interventionists in training target academic behaviors.
The coupled CFD PBM model along with the two-zone variable diffusivity shrinking core reaction model was utilized in baseline design of a bench scale high temperature, high pressure regenerative carbon capture process in the riser section of a circulation fluidized bed.
Independent sample t tests were utilized to analyze the total lifting volume at baseline, and repeated measures ANOVA was utilized to assess changes in total lifting volume over time.
A pre- and post-test design was utilized to gauge baseline knowledge, as well as learning from the presented materials.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com