Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(9)
Most of MVC recovery occurred between POST and D+2, then MVC returned progressively to baseline values for both muscles (Figure 3B and 3C).
Hemoglobin levels returned to baseline values for both groups within 8 weeks after cessation of treatment.
The lack of change for fear of falling was most likely due to the low baseline values for both groups.
Baseline values for both groups combined at inclusion were 44 ± 8 (males) and 34 ± 9 (females) mL · min−1 · kg−1, respectively.
Furthermore, an increase of almost 20% above baseline values for both CA-I and CA-II was observed in the maternal erythrocytes at parturition [ 23].
Baseline values for both glucosamine (93.4 ± 33.4 ng/ml) and reparagen (89.1 ± 32.6 ng/ml) treatment groups were comparable, indicating effective randomization.
Similar(51)
Pre-operative baseline values for the clinical measurements were similar for both RCR groups.
Baseline values for lipid levels were similar in both groups.
The bone resorption markers serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase type 5b and urinary type I collagen cross-linked N-telopeptide were significantly decreased from baseline values for the entire study period in both groups.
Following a period of stabilization after surgical preparation, baseline values for cardiovascular variables were similar in both groups prior to E. coli infusion and the concomitant injection of the anti-L-selectin antibody or the equivalent volume of Ringer's solution.
In both types of studies, we recorded the mean change from baseline values for the PMX group and variance estimates for this change, when reported.
More suggestions(14)
initial values for both
best values for both
baseline scores for both
baseline variables for both
baseline results for both
baseline templates for both
baseline assessments for both
baseline levels for both
baseline features for both
baseline data for both
baseline hazards for both
baseline samples for both
baseline measures for both
baseline characteristics for both
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com