The percentages at or above baseline (level II) and norm (level III) proficiency give us an idea of how many students are proficient enough to successfully compete in an English-speaking globalized society: Over 80% of native speakers scored at or above baseline proficiency, in our sample of non-native speakers the percentage was 56.8%.
To show a 10% difference from 35%to45%5%, a smaller sample size is required, therefore with our current approach we would have more than adequate power to show a 10% difference if the baseline breastfeeding in our sample were 35%.
Sixty-nine percent of patients were identified as white, 13%% as African American, and 11%% as Hispanic.> -wrap-foot> aPercentages may not add up to 100 because of rounding The mean baseline DCSI value in our sample was 0.85.
Although food insecurity is less common in Massachusetts than many other states, the reported rate of food insecurity in this sample was more than triple that of the state overall in the baseline period (26% in our sample vs. 8% in the state) (25).
The 7 scores produced by the remaining 6 cognitive tests (the pattern recognition task produces two unique scores that assess different aspects of cognition), were each standardized to a z-score using the mean and standard deviation of scores from the baseline cognitive assessment in our sample.
As a result, the baseline HbA1c was higher in our sample than the ELDER sample (mean HbA1c: 8.1% vs. 6.8%, respectively).
In our sample, baseline locomotor activity does predict acute response to cocaine, as demonstrated by the correlation between saline-induced and acute cocaine-induced activity.
Similarly, we did not observe any significant alteration in line bisection performance, although we note that mean pretreatment baseline performance in line bisection in our sample was relatively close to normal (mean rightward deviation: 4.5 mm).
Observed PAID means in our sample were baseline M = 39.8, posttest M = 34.9, and thentest M = 43.9.
The Walk-Ratio in our sample at baseline (total group 0.43; female 0.41; male 0.47) was lower compared to physically active 80 85 years old women walking under same conditions (fast walking, Walk-Ratio 0.53 [ 35]), suggesting a 'cautious gait pattern' in our participants, as previously identified in individuals with dementia [ 54].
