Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(8)
No significant difference in baseline characteristics was found between the groups (Table 1).
No significant difference in baseline characteristics was found, with the exception of age (Table 2).
No difference in the baseline characteristics was found between treated subjects and those who refused therapy.
No significant difference in NNT after stratifying the population by baseline characteristics was found (Supplementary Table 1).
No significant difference in the baseline characteristics was found in the patients who received etomidate compared with those who did not (Table 1).
No significant difference in baseline characteristics was found between active TBM and suspected LTBM patients with exception of headache and vomiting (P < 0.05).
Similar(52)
Additional details of baseline characteristics are found in Table 1.
None of the measured baseline characteristics were found to be statistically significantly different between the groups.
No significant differences in baseline characteristics were found between matched pregabalin (n=794) and duloxetine cohorts (n=794).
No differences in baseline characteristics were found between the subgroups for either of the treatment groups.
No other significant differences in baseline characteristics were found between these two groups.
More suggestions(18)
baseline characteristics was limited
baseline characteristics was performed
baseline characteristics was collected
baseline characteristics was made
baseline characteristics were found
baseline characteristics was calculated
baseline data was found
baseline characteristics was assessed
baseline measurements was found
baseline characteristics was estimated
baseline characteristics was compared
baseline sites was found
baseline characteristics was explored
baseline characteristics was done
baseline characteristics was tested
baseline values was found
baseline characteristics was investigated
baseline characteristics was used
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com